2023年12月26日托福考后真题回顾机经：综合写作重复旧题！

2024-01-02 18:01:28 编辑：保定环球教育浏览(124)

保定环球教育托福培训咨询热线：0312-5936111

环球教育保定托福培训机构提供：2023年12月26日托福考后真题回顾机经：综合写作重复旧题！关注环球教育保定分校微信公众号，获取更多保定托福考试资讯。

口语部分

独立口语：Task1

Some people think that only those who perform well in secondary school should be able to attend university. Others believe that anyone who really wants to attend university should have that opportunity. Which view do you agree with

Task2

Reading：学校要为好学生提供一个来中国学习的机会，这样学生可以通过这个机会学习更多的知识

Listening：agree

Reason 1: 中国是一个拥有悠久历史的国家，去中国学习可以让学生们领略到不同的建筑风格，不同的历史文化，这和他们本国的现代化的建筑是截然不同的

Reason 2: 因为是去学习，所以学生们会很认真的对待这件事情而不是当作是一次游玩，是可以学到新得东西的

Task3

Reading：讲述的是一种现象，当人们面临选择的时候，会倾向于选择积极的一面

Listening：听力中讲了天气预报的例子，不同的天气预报的播报形式，人们做出不同的选择，例如天气预报说明天下雨，这时候人们会选择带伞出门。但是如果天气预报说只有一般的概率会下雨，那这个时候人们会选择不带雨伞。另外在去药店买药的时候，两种不同的表达方式也会带来不同的结果，当店员说这个药90%的概率可以治好，但是如果说的是10%的概率治不好，人们会买前者

Task4

Listening：动物群居的两大优点

Advantage 1：动物群居有利于在寒冷的时候抱团取暖

Advantage 2:动物群居时遇到天敌可以更好的应对

综合写作

【完全重复22年4月家考】

主题：space-based or earth-based solar panels, 哪种更好

阅读总观点：solar-based更好

阅读分论点一：capture more energy，因为没有clouds block the sun’s rays

阅读分论点二：protected from impacts of high-speed meteoroids

阅读分论点三：better for the environment，不会disturb natural ecosystems

听力总观点：反驳，earth-based更好

听力分论点一：parts of a space panel 可能会malfunction，这就意味着需要send a repair team into space，会很贵，加上在维修期间设备并不会collect energy，那么总能量不一定会更多

听力分论点二：space dust避不掉，这些dust太小了。这些高速的space dust会break apart并且产生高热，这些都会影响设备运行

听力分论点三：space-based solar panels还是有可能对环境有害，captured energy would be sent back to earth as powerful beams，而这些光束会damage ozone layer，最终对生物产生影响，experience of negative health effects, reduction in the crop yield，这些危害可能比earth-based panels带来的还要大

学术讨论写作

教授：outdoor activities

同类型话题出现较多，比如20230723（改革前版本）和20231210（改革后版本）的家考中都有出现，包括官网例题13也是同类型题目。

以20230723这道题为例：

Dr. Gupta

This week, we'll be discussing ways in which schools can help expose their students (aged 5-18) to learning experiences beyond the classroom. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea that some schools are considering--offering outdoor classes once a month. On the day of outdoor classes, students will be transported to local parks or nature preserves, and teachers can help students explore nature and learn about the environment. Do you think this is a good idea? Why or why not?

Kelly

Having outdoor classes once a month seems like an exciting way of providing students with interesting hands-on experiences. However, I don't think these classes would be a worthwhile use of instructional time and of school resources. These classes could put substantial pressure on schools' financial resources and on teachers, who may have to redesign their lesson plans.

Paul

Outdoor classes can increase students' motivation for learning about inter-connectedness in the natural world. These classes could be great opportunities to teach students about dire environmental problems, such as pollution, and ways of addressing these problems. It will deepen their understanding beyond what books could do and would be time well spent.

审题要点：

1.experiences beyond the classroom

2.outdoor classes—local parks and nature preserves

3.help explore nature and learn about the environment

基于审题要点回答问题：is it a good idea/worthwhile activity

可行分论点：

1.同意Paul，hands-on experience can help students better understand the situations of endangered animals, and thus take actions to protect them，细节部分需要在Paul的基础上进行拓展

2.not a good idea, 除了学校的financial burden之后，还需要考虑老师在户外环境中的教学困境

3.worthwhile, arouse students’ learning interest in biology or projects related to the environment

保定环球雅思简介.jpg